Revising Wikpedia
Among everything else, I write a newspaper column for several small newspapers in Northern Manitoba. Not much, about 600 words or so each week focused on technology and culture. Not a geeky "how - to" column, I'll often write about ways that technology and culture are intersecting and changing each other. This week, in light of Google's announcement of Knol, I thought it would be a good week to write about Wikipedia, knowledge, and experts. I put a call out on Twitter looking for a page that shows "live" recent changes that have been made to WIkipedia pages. Within a few minutes I received a few replies from several different people, all highlighting this site. Exploring it a bit I found that if you click on the small "diff" tag on each change that is displayed, you are sent to a page that highlights the differences between the new version of the page and the old version like you would be able to see on a wikispaces history page. This live revision of knowledge fascinated me and I looked at a few different pages before I came upon this change that had been made to the Moon Landings page:

Now this was even more interesting to me. Vandalism in action. While I am a fairly heavy user of Wikipedia and a strong supporter of their concept, I'll admit that I've made few edits to their pages. I do know that a dedicated team of people watch the millions of pages carefully looking for changes such as this one. But I was surprised to keep my eye on this page and see that it was corrected in under twenty minutes. I had though that "hot button" issues and topics would be watched carefully and corrected, but for a random historical page such as this to be fixed so quickly ensures my confidence of this site.
I encourage the students in my class to use Wikipedia. I encourage them to use it first and confirm what they find there by checking other sites. That being said, I encourage them to do the same at all other sites they find as well. Any site on the internet is just as apt to be incorrect and biased as any other, and with the huge community of users editing and improving Wikipedia, errors, omissions, and biases are apt to be caught and corrected.
Knowledge is out of the gate.



